Hydrohistorian
Full diagnostic snapshot pending — this district's weekly-style report (system status, active calls, hydrographs, anomaly flags) is produced by the nightly rotation and appears here after its first run. The tabs above are live now.
Evolution of the network
Gage flow trend & changepoints
What counts as a trend here
Computed 2026-08-20 09:03 from 4 gage(s) with cached period-of-record data. Mann-Kendall (trend) and Pettitt (changepoint) both require at least 8 years spanning at least 10 years of record. A gage below that reports no signal — which is not the same as “no change.”
None of the 4 gages with enough record shows a significant trend or a detected shift — which is itself the finding.
No gage shows a statistically significant trend or changepoint yet.
4 other gage(s) show no significant trend or changepoint (not shown).
How the measurement network itself changed
This basin was not always measured the way it is today — the API-era record is dense and recent, the early record sparse. 1 gage(s) and 90 structure(s) report in 2026, but structure reporting only reached half its modern level around ~1995. Every historical claim below is checked against this: long-term shifts that co-move with the growth of the network carry an explicit measurement-evolution caution, and abandonment screens whose idleness begins before the modern reporting era are flagged †.
| Decade | Gages with data (median yr) | Structures reporting (median yr) |
|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 1 | 0 |
| 1940s | 2 | 0 |
| 1950s | 2 | 0 |
| 1970s | 0 | 18 |
| 1980s | 1 | 46 |
| 1990s | 0 | 57 |
| 2000s | 0 | 56 |
| 2010s | 0 | 108 |
| 2020s | 1 | 90 |
Mass-balance (network closure) trend
Structure divrec-history backfill coverage as of the last check: 28% of 177 schematic-relevant structures. 0 year(s) clear the 30% coverage gate so far -- the trend activates automatically once qualifying years span a full decade. No action needed; the nightly backfill keeps extending the record.
Reach gain/loss shifts (–)
Mass-balance kinks computed for every summer month back to (0 reach-snapshots) — which reaches gain or lose water, and how that has shifted across decades. Each shift is cross-checked against the observation record above: as more diversions became metered, "unaccounted" water shrinks mechanically, which can masquerade as a hydrologic shift.
No reach shows a statistically significant long-term gain/loss shift.
Groundwater now has its own tab: 3 monitored well(s), water-table trends, stream corridors, and the advisory depletion screen.
Reservoirs now has its own tab: 9 reservoir(s), end-of-year storage back to 1976, click-to-chart histories.
Cross-gage pattern fingerprint
Not enough gages with a long enough common-coverage window yet to fingerprint shared patterns.
Data provenance & quality
Where these numbers come from and how far they can be trusted. Grade C (3/6 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (imported 2026-08-19) for history, plus the CDSS REST API for current conditions.
| Check | State | What was measured |
|---|---|---|
| gage freshness | stale | newest gage reading is 45 day(s) old (target 7) |
| diversion record | expected-lag | newest diversion record is 293 day(s) old (DWR publishes ~1 year in arrears) |
| structure coverage | sparse | 28% of schematic structures have data |
Independent check: PASS — 100.0000% agreement across 158,849 stored values re-checked against DWR's authoritative record (HydroBase_CO_20260707), over 20 structures. 0 disagreement(s) beyond a 0.01 cfs tolerance. Checked 2026-08-19; a rotating sample covers the whole basin across successive runs, and the structures this report cites are checked every time.
Federal cross-check: PASS — 100.00% day-level agreement with USGS's own published records for the same gages, across 3 co-listed station(s) and 11,776 overlapping days (within max(2%, 0.5 cfs) daily). Pre-1950 records at some gages carry known between-agency day-stamp and transcription differences — scored at each year's best ±1-day alignment; residual disagreement is real historical divergence, flagged for review.
4 gage(s) / 15,585 daily values (1936-10-01–2026-07-06); 148 structure(s) with diversion records; 533 with decreed rights. Methodology has not yet had independent expert review — treat every figure as an advisory screen, not an administrative or legal conclusion.
17 water-level measurements across 3 monitored well(s) — 3 alluvial, 0 bedrock — plus 1 administered well(s) reporting metered pumping.
What is being counted
Observation wells and pumping wells are different populations and are never conflated: water levels come from monitored observation wells, and metered pumping comes from administered wells reporting through diversion records. Click any well to chart its own record.
Well map
3D aquifer x-ray
Every aquifer unit as its own head surface, animated through time.
How the surfaces are built, and what they are not
Alluvial water table on top, Denver Basin members (Dawson, Denver, Arapahoe, Laramie–Fox Hills) stacked beneath where measured, interpolated from measured water levels. Units are never mixed; a surface exists only inside its own unit's well coverage, with no extrapolation; thin epochs are suppressed and say why. Vertical scale is exaggerated for readability and z is head elevation in feet. These are measured heads, not a calibrated groundwater model.
Water-table trends
Of 0 well(s) with enough record for a trend test: 0 declining, 0 rising.
Wells labeled by administrative world before anything else is said about them: tributary alluvium participates in the priority system; designated-basin and Denver Basin bedrock aquifers are governed differently and are excluded from stream-connection reasoning. Read bedrock declines differently too: deep bedrock aquifers recharge negligibly on human timescales, so a falling bedrock level is storage mining — effectively permanent — not a drought response that a wet year undoes. All screens advisory.
9 reservoir(s) with 1,382 storage measurement(s), 1976–2026. Basin storage as of 2025-10-29 (the record's own end — reservoir records publish ~annually): 454 AF across 3 reservoir(s).
Why storage matters to the flow network
Storage change is real water the mass balance must credit — a losing reach beside a filling reservoir isn't losing water, it's banking it.
Reservoir map — how full is each vessel?
What “full” is measured against
Bubble size is proportional to a reservoir's record-high storage. Fill is its last recorded storage as a share of its surveyed capacity (USACE National Inventory of Dams) where a confident NID match exists — the tooltip names the matched dam — and as a share of its own record high otherwise. A wrong capacity would be worse than an honest record high, so only confident joins upgrade.
A dashed teal ring marks reservoirs reporting live DWR telemetry: their fill reflects yesterday's storage, is drawn as a dotted tail on charts, and is treated as provisional until the next verified HydroBase snapshot supersedes it.
Basin storage, end of each water year
End-of-water-year totals; per-year reservoir counts shown because reporting coverage varies -- a total is only comparable to years with similar counts.
Largest reservoirs on record
Click a reservoir to chart its full storage history.
| Reservoir | Last recorded storage (AF) | As of |
|---|---|---|
| ▸ CRAIG RES NO 2 (6303640) | 438 | 2025-10-20 |
| ▸ BURG RESERVOIR (6303641) | 101 | 2023-05-08 |
| ▸ ASPEN RESERVOIR (6303664) | 30 | 2012-05-07 |
| ▸ CASTO RESERVOIR (6303643) | 16 | 2025-10-16 |
| ▸ CASEMENT RESERVOIR (6303642) | 14 | 2023-07-24 |
| ▸ BEAR POND (6303665) | 8 | 2012-05-07 |
| ▸ PACE RESERVOIR (6303654) | 4 | 2011-05-23 |
| ▸ CRAIG RES NO 1 (6303644) | 0 | 2025-10-29 |
Decreed rights on this network run from 1883-04-01 to 2018-10-26. 17 abandonment screens and 74 compliance flags are listed below as leads for review — a screen is not an abandonment and a flag is not a violation.
Rights on file: 679 across 533 structure(s); 39 structure(s) carry 0 court-case references. Advisory reading aids on public DWR data — not administrative or legal conclusions.
Abandonment radar (17 screens)
Absolute rights with 10+ years of no recorded diversions. Screens only — storage, alternate points, and plan operations can explain nonuse lawfully. And diversion REPORTING itself only reached its modern level ~1995 — idleness that begins before then may be unreported use, not nonuse (flagged † below).
- BURG DITCH NO 3 (6300511) (1897-08-15, 2.1 cfs decreed): last active 1996 — 29 years idle
- BURG DITCH NO 4 (6300512) (1897-08-15, 12.5 cfs decreed): last active 1996 — 29 years idle
- CLIFF DWELLERS DITCH (6300517) (1916-12-04, 0.8 cfs decreed): last active 1999 — 26 years idle
- COTTONWOOD DITCH (6300519) (1900-02-01, 5.1 cfs decreed): last active 2001 — 24 years idle
- BURG RESERVOIR (6303641) (1901-08-15, 0.0 cfs decreed): last active 2003 — 22 years idle
- RED CROSS DITCH (6300553) (1900-02-01, 10.1 cfs decreed): last active 2006 — 19 years idle
- WILLOW SPRINGS DITCH (6300645) (1968-08-06, 2.5 cfs decreed): last active 2009 — 16 years idle
- TRIANGLE BAR DITCH (6300564) (1885-04-25, 2.6 cfs decreed): last active 2010 — 15 years idle
- UNAWEEP CATTLE RANGE D 4 (6300567) (1883-04-15, 6.2 cfs decreed): last active 2011 — 14 years idle
- WINES DITCH NO. 1 (6300575) (1900-02-01, 5.8 cfs decreed): last active 2011 — 14 years idle
Compliance screens (74 advisory flags)
Screened 106 of 533 structures with rights (128 have diversion history on file). A flag is a lead for expert review — augmentation plans, exchanges, and free-river conditions can make over-decree diversions lawful and are deliberately not modeled.
- LOBA DITCH NO 5 (6300538): Observed p99 daily rate 19.5 cfs (max 20.8) exceeds total decreed absolute 6.1 cfs across 5306 recorded day(s).
- UNAWEEP CATTLE RANGE D 2 (6300565): Observed p99 daily rate 16.2 cfs (max 20.1) exceeds total decreed absolute 4.7 cfs across 10992 recorded day(s).
- WINES DITCH NO. 1 (6300575): Observed p99 daily rate 12.0 cfs (max 16.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 5.8 cfs across 10030 recorded day(s).
- BURG DITCH NO 2 (6300510): Observed p99 daily rate 9.5 cfs (max 10.2) exceeds total decreed absolute 3.9 cfs across 4020 recorded day(s).
- HIGHLINE DITCH (6300530): Observed p99 daily rate 8.5 cfs (max 12.4) exceeds total decreed absolute 2.0 cfs across 5386 recorded day(s).
- UNAWEEP CATTLE RANGE D 3 (6300566): Observed p99 daily rate 7.4 cfs (max 9.5) exceeds total decreed absolute 3.5 cfs across 6062 recorded day(s).
- BOOTH DITCH NO 1 (6300506): Observed p99 daily rate 7.0 cfs (max 12.4) exceeds total decreed absolute 6.3 cfs across 13122 recorded day(s).
- IDLEWILD HIGHLINE D NO 2 (6300531): Observed p99 daily rate 6.9 cfs (max 6.9) exceeds total decreed absolute 4.4 cfs across 2064 recorded day(s).
- PANSY HIGHLINE DITCH (6300549): Observed p99 daily rate 6.5 cfs (max 6.5) exceeds total decreed absolute 1.4 cfs across 2128 recorded day(s).
- HARMS DITCH (6300528): Observed p99 daily rate 6.2 cfs (max 7.8) exceeds total decreed absolute 5.1 cfs across 9694 recorded day(s).
Seniority (top structures by decreed rate)
| Structure | Senior priority date | Rights | Decreed abs (cfs) | Decreed abs (AF) | Conditional? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOLORES RIVER INSTREAM FLOW WATER RIGHT (6300831) | 2014-01-28 | 1 | 900.0 | 0 | — |
| PINE MESA DITCH, HEADGATE NO. 1 (6300552) | 1891-04-01 | 2 | 17.2 | 0 | — |
| SILZELL DITCH (6300558) | 1937-11-01 | 2 | 12.7 | 0 | — |
| BURG DITCH NO 4 (6300512) | 1897-08-15 | 3 | 12.5 | 0 | — |
| PATTERSON DITCH (6300550) | 1915-03-01 | 3 | 11.1 | 0 | — |
| RED CROSS DITCH (6300553) | 1900-02-01 | 7 | 10.1 | 0 | yes |
| BARTHOLOMEW AND HATCH D (6300501) | 1900-02-01 | 7 | 9.3 | 0 | — |
| NOLAN DITCH (6300547) | 1883-04-01 | 3 | 8.0 | 0 | — |
| HARMS AND HAZEL DITCH (6300529) | 1890-05-01 | 4 | 7.8 | 0 | — |
| MESA CREEK DITCH (6300542) | 1909-05-01 | 2 | 7.5 | 0 | — |
| WEST CREEK DITCH NO 1 (6300572) | 1900-11-27 | 4 | 7.2 | 0 | — |
| CLIFF RANCH DITCH (6300518) | 1900-02-01 | 7 | 7.2 | 0 | — |
| IDLEWILD HIGHLINE DITCH (6300597) | 1911-08-15 | 3 | 6.7 | 0 | — |
| ROC CREEK (6300625) | 2000-01-23 | 1 | 6.6 | 0 | — |
| BOOTH DITCH NO 1 (6300506) | 1895-07-13 | 3 | 6.3 | 0 | — |
No inventory or legal-document changes detected since the daily watch began.
If a call were placed at a given seniority, which structures in this basin would be out of priority, and how much of their decreed rate would be curtailed? Computed from this basin's cached decrees.
What this does and doesn't model. Seniority arithmetic only: every right junior to the call is treated as curtailed. It does not model reach applicability — structures downstream of the calling point are not administered by it — and it applies no futile-call judgment. Read it as “who is junior to this date, and by how much,” not as a prediction of what the Division Engineer would actually order.
Pick a calling right
Real decrees from this basin, ordered by administration number — that is, by actual seniority. The years will look out of order, and that is correct: an administration number encodes the adjudication date as well as the appropriation date, so a right appropriated in 1970 can be administered ahead of one from 1950. A senior call curtails almost everything; a junior one curtails almost nothing.
Or enter an administration number directly
DWR administration numbers encode appropriation and adjudication dates; lower is more senior.