← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

TODD BEAN/SELECT ENERGY PUMP & RESERVOIR

Structure dossier · WDID 0100839 · 3 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 2015-07-317072nd most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JONS-COX NT LFH WELL FIELD (2015-07-23). Immediately behind: NEW CACHE AGRICULTURAL POND 1 (2015-07-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
60477.02015-07-312015-12-31 9.15.9 CIRRCOMINDRECFISAUGEVP

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 130 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 131 AF — 101% of that, and 7th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2014 68 3rd lowest of 11 · 52% of median 16 13 4.9
2015 8 1st lowest of 11 · 6% of median 17 3 2.4
2016 214 9th lowest of 11 · 165% of median 263 39 5.0
2017 254 10th lowest of 11 · 195% of median 37 63 13.9
2018 366 11th lowest of 11 · 282% of median 80 4.3
2019 205 8th lowest of 11 · 158% of median 68 4.4
2020 81 5th lowest of 11 · 62% of median 38 3.2
2021 80 4th lowest of 11 · 62% of median 43 2.5
2022 130 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 26 14.6
2023 30 2nd lowest of 11 · 23% of median 37 4.8
2024 131 7th lowest of 11 · 101% of median 256 3.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 666 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 30% of the irrigation seasons in 2014-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.