Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
RIVERSIDE CLARK POND 1 RECHARGE AREA
Structure dossier · WDID 0102105 · RA · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 2002-04-30 — 4713th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RIVERSIDE CULPEPPER POND 2 RECHARGE AREA (2002-04-30). Immediately behind: RIVERSIDE SAND BAR CLUB POND RECHARGE AR (2002-04-30).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55637.0 | 2002-04-30 | 2002-12-31 | 312.9 | 687.1 | A | FISRCHWLD | |
| 55637.0 | 2002-04-30 | 2002-12-31 | 21.33 | 18.67 | C | FISRCHWLD |
Legal record & documents
2 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
14CW3082, 02CW0086.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
14CW3082 | 1 | 2002-12-31 | S |
02CW0086 | 1 | 2002-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 787 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 563 AF — 72% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 1,717 | 14th lowest of 15 · 218% of median | 120 | 21.3 |
| 2010 | 1,142 | 11th lowest of 15 · 145% of median | 123 | 21.0 |
| 2011 | 1,314 | 13th lowest of 15 · 167% of median | 145 | 10.4 |
| 2012 | 129 | 1st lowest of 15 · 16% of median | 29 | 5.1 |
| 2013 | 864 | 9th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 48 | 13.7 |
| 2014 | 576 | 5th lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 78 | 6.1 |
| 2015 | 1,948 | 15th lowest of 15 · 248% of median | 140 | 10.6 |
| 2016 | 787 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 52 | 12.2 |
| 2017 | 1,304 | 12th lowest of 15 · 166% of median | 87 | 18.8 |
| 2018 | 762 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 50 | 13.5 |
| 2019 | 1,011 | 10th lowest of 15 · 128% of median | 83 | 11.2 |
| 2020 | 508 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 34 | 9.8 |
| 2021 | 549 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 41 | 10.8 |
| 2023 | 768 | 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 50 | 10.1 |
| 2024 | 563 | 4th lowest of 15 · 72% of median | 46 | 13.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1152 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 28% of the irrigation seasons in 2005-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.