← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WOOD RES
Structure dossier · WDID 0303786 · 3 · ROULLARD DRAW · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1892-12-22 — 214th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ELKHORN CREEK (1892-06-01). Immediately behind: BROKEN ARROW RANCH W 6 (1893-05-05).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15697.0 | 1892-12-22 | 1904-12-09 | 2754.82 | 0.0 | A | IRRRECFISWLD | |
| 19645.0 | 1903-10-15 | 1904-12-09 | 459.14 | 0.0 | A | IRRRECFISWLD | |
| 35050.24471 | 1916-12-31 | 1953-09-10 | 1377.41 | 0.0 | A | IRRRECFISWLD |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 537 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 537 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 915 | 12th lowest of 15 · 170% of median | 583 | 218 | 7.9 |
| 1997 | 1,882 | 15th lowest of 15 · 350% of median | 1,919 | 185 | 16.5 |
| 1998 | 1,450 | 13th lowest of 15 · 270% of median | 1,829 | 191 | 27.5 |
| 1999 | 634 | 11th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 1,371 | 152 | 30.3 |
| 2000 | 1,585 | 14th lowest of 15 · 295% of median | 946 | 245 | 36.9 |
| 2001 | 317 | 5th lowest of 15 · 59% of median | 1,224 | 122 | 2.4 |
| 2002 | 216 | 4th lowest of 15 · 40% of median | 1,246 | 122 | 1.2 |
| 2003 | 395 | 7th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 804 | 152 | 2.6 |
| 2004 | 164 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 30% of median | 945 | 92 | 1.9 |
| 2005 | 541 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 719 | 244 | 4.0 |
| 2006 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2,434 | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2007 | 353 | 6th lowest of 15 · 66% of median | 144 | 126 | 2.6 |
| 2008 | 48 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 9% of median | 479 | 61 | 0.5 |
| 2009 | 594 | 10th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 709 | 186 | 6.0 |
| 2010 | 537 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 723 | 153 | 5.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.