← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HARRIS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 0600611 · DITCH · COAL CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: no administrative call record for this basin.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1876-04-30 — 201st most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0600747 (1875-05-01). Immediately behind: 0600572 (1877-06-01).
On COAL CREEK at river mile 9.8, it is 23rd of 29 down the reach. Immediately upstream: KERR DITCH NO 2. Immediately downstream: T N WILLIS DITCH.
Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20890.09617 | 1876-04-30 | 1926-06-21 | 7.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 207 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1997, came in at 1,077 AF — 520% of that, and 14th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1978 | 362 | 11th lowest of 15 · 175% of median | 128 | 3.0 |
| 1979 | 117 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 59 | 1.5 |
| 1980 | 153 | 5th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 52 | 2.0 |
| 1981 | 284 | 9th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | 134 | 2.0 |
| 1984 | 297 | 10th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | 38 | 4.5 |
| 1985 | 180 | 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 61 | 2.0 |
| 1986 | 1,180 | 15th lowest of 15 · 570% of median | 121 | 5.0 |
| 1989 | 417 | 12th lowest of 15 · 201% of median | 74 | 3.0 |
| 1990 | 184 | 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 35 | 3.0 |
| 1991 | 143 | 4th lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 26 | 3.0 |
| 1992 | 207 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 45 | 2.5 |
| 1993 | 87 | 1st lowest of 15 · 42% of median | 25 | 2.0 |
| 1994 | 117 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 38 | 2.0 |
| 1996 | 601 | 13th lowest of 15 · 290% of median | 168 | 2.0 |
| 1997 | 1,077 | 14th lowest of 15 · 520% of median | 183 | 3.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.