← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CAMP CREEK PIPELINE

Structure dossier · WDID 1000522 · 7 · CAMP CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:37 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1906-07-25162nd most senior of the 2864 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: THREE EAGLES RESERVOIR (1905-12-31). Immediately behind: HUGH J NEVINS WELL (1907-01-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
20659.01906-07-251919-06-02 3.050.0 CIRR 175

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 75 AF — 3750% of that, and 11th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1969 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 61 0.0
1970 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 304 0.0
1971 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 365 0.0
1972 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 305 0.0
2019 2 5th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 61 0.0
2020 13 7th lowest of 11 · 650% of median 245 0.1
2021 2 5th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 62 0.0
2022 38 8th lowest of 11 · 1900% of median 365 0.3
2023 43 9th lowest of 11 · 2150% of median 365 0.3
2024 52 10th lowest of 11 · 2600% of median 366 0.1
2025 75 11th lowest of 11 · 3750% of median 304 0.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2803 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 23% of the irrigation seasons in 1969-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.