← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MESA PIPELINE
Structure dossier · WDID 1000609 · 7 · NORTH CHEYENNE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1860-09-01 — 3rd most senior of the 2864 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SOUTH CHEYENNE PIPELINE (1860-09-01). Immediately behind: CASCADE CREEK DIVERSION (1861-03-20).
Decreed rights (10)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3897.0 | 1860-09-01 | 1882-03-06 | 1.9 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | |
| 4282.0 | 1861-09-21 | 1882-03-06 | 4.59 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | |
| 4748.0 | 1862-12-31 | 1882-03-06 | 1.25 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | |
| 4808.0 | 1863-03-01 | 1882-03-06 | 9.55 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | |
| 4828.0 | 1863-03-21 | 1882-03-06 | 6.52 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | |
| 4878.0 | 1863-05-10 | 1882-03-06 | 1.14 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | |
| 5113.0 | 1863-12-31 | 1882-03-06 | 4.59 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 5479.0 | 1864-12-31 | 1882-03-06 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | |
| 8208.0 | 1872-06-21 | 1882-03-06 | 0.9 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | |
| 28595.0 | 1928-04-16 | 1954-02-08 | 17.3 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | 161A |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,379 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1989, came in at 538 AF — 39% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 1,379 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 365 | 6.7 |
| 1976 | 1,325 | 5th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 336 | 6.6 |
| 1977 | 1,417 | 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 355 | 4.2 |
| 1978 | 1,001 | 4th lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 355 | 3.5 |
| 1979 | 1,388 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 301 | 5.6 |
| 1980 | 1,994 | 13th lowest of 15 · 145% of median | 350 | 10.6 |
| 1981 | 1,579 | 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 330 | 8.4 |
| 1982 | 1,362 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 219 | 25.6 |
| 1983 | 742 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 168 | 8.4 |
| 1984 | 943 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 249 | 8.2 |
| 1985 | 3,136 | 15th lowest of 15 · 227% of median | 317 | 14.2 |
| 1986 | 2,030 | 14th lowest of 15 · 147% of median | 335 | 11.6 |
| 1987 | 1,632 | 12th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 277 | 10.4 |
| 1988 | 1,359 | 6th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 330 | 7.1 |
| 1989 | 538 | 1st lowest of 15 · 39% of median | 298 | 2.2 |
Call-derived yield: senior right divertible 97.7% of a median season / 58.9% dry-year.
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.