Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SPRING RUN RESERVOIR 2
Structure dossier · WDID 1003677 · 3 · SPRING RUN CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:49 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1888-08-21 — 111th most senior of the 2864 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CATAMOUNT RESERVOIR NO 1 (1888-04-15). Immediately behind: LAKE MORAINE RESERVOIR (1888-12-31).
Decreed rights (7)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14113.0 | 1888-08-21 | 1919-06-02 | 89.07 | 0.0 | A | IRR | R12, R13 |
| 19670.0 | 1903-11-09 | 1919-06-02 | 23.42 | 0.0 | A | IRR | R42 |
| 22014.0 | 1910-04-10 | 1919-06-02 | 265.12 | 0.0 | A | IRR | R52 |
| 58103.0 | 2009-01-29 | 2010-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRR | |
| 58103.0 | 2009-01-29 | 2010-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 58439.58103 | 2009-01-29 | 2010-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 58439.58103 | 2009-01-29 | 2010-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRR |
Legal record & documents
9 decreed actions on record across
5 court cases:
16CW3060, 13CW3014, 10CW0094, CA55314, CA10146.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
16CW3060 | 1 | 2010-12-31 | S |
13CW3014 | 1 | 2010-12-31 | S |
10CW0094 | 3 | 2010-12-31 | O, S |
CA55314 | 2 | 1919-06-02 | S |
CA10146 | 2 | 1919-06-02 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 1 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 57 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1995, came in at 57 AF — 100% of that, and 1st lowest of the 1 year with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 57 | 1st lowest of 1 · 100% of median | 113 | 0.4 |
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 7 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | fragment | 113 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history) |
| record continuity | unknown | record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days) |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.