← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

1100869

Structure dossier · WDID 1100869 · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1880-04-30152nd most senior of the 1489 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 1100798 (1880-04-30). Immediately behind: ARK VALLEY IRRIGATION CO (1880-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
11078.01880-04-301890-06-19 0.30.0 CIRR 73

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 64 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 62 AF — 97% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2008 67 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 122 0.3
2009 92 13th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 157 0.3
2010 58 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 113 0.3
2011 76 10th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 162 0.3
2012 41 1st lowest of 15 · 64% of median 112 0.3
2013 89 12th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 153 0.3
2014 55 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 175 0.4
2015 114 15th lowest of 15 · 178% of median 195 0.3
2016 93 14th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 162 0.3
2017 88 11th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 166 0.3
2018 43 2nd lowest of 15 · 67% of median 186 0.3
2019 64 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 152 0.3
2020 53 4th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 96 0.3
2021 51 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median 88 0.3
2023 62 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 106 0.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity partial missing name, structure type, water source
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3530 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 17% of the irrigation seasons in 1926-2023 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.