← My Water · Print / save as PDF
INTERLAKEN DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 1101086 · 1 · LONGS GULCH · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1880-12-31 — 493rd most senior of the 1489 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HOOVER SEEP DITCH (1875-12-31). Immediately behind: LANGHOFF DITCH HDGT 3 (1880-12-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33951.11323 | 1880-12-31 | 1969-07-09 | 1.6 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | A8 |
Recorded use (last 11 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 13 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2017, came in at 69 AF — 531% of that, and 9th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 12 | 5th lowest of 11 · 92% of median | 142 | 0.3 |
| 2006 | 13 | 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median | 160 | 0.1 |
| 2007 | 141 | 11th lowest of 11 · 1085% of median | 159 | 0.5 |
| 2008 | 9 | 3rd lowest of 11 · 69% of median | 110 | 0.0 |
| 2011 | 7 | 2nd lowest of 11 · 54% of median | 82 | 0.1 |
| 2012 | 2 | 1st lowest of 11 · 15% of median | 22 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | 15 | 7th lowest of 11 · 115% of median | 95 | 0.1 |
| 2014 | 19 | 8th lowest of 11 · 146% of median | 144 | 0.3 |
| 2015 | 89 | 10th lowest of 11 · 685% of median | 121 | 0.5 |
| 2016 | 10 | 4th lowest of 11 · 77% of median | 144 | 0.0 |
| 2017 | 69 | 9th lowest of 11 · 531% of median | 81 | 2.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.