← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

JARVIS BOTTOM DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 1300643 · 1 · GRAPE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1879-06-10288th most senior of the 1017 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HALL DITCH NO 3 (1879-06-01). Immediately behind: L FRANK COTTONWOOD CR 1 (1879-06-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
10753.01879-06-101896-03-12 2.00.0 CIRR 225A

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 151 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 165 AF — 109% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 131 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 44 2.0
2011 151 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 59 1.8
2012 36 2nd lowest of 15 · 24% of median 22 1.0
2013 110 4th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 43 2.0
2014 198 11th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 55 2.0
2015 288 14th lowest of 15 · 191% of median 81 2.0
2016 126 5th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 35 2.0
2017 304 15th lowest of 15 · 201% of median 85 2.0
2018 4 1st lowest of 15 · 3% of median 9 0.3
2019 202 12th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 60 2.0
2020 61 3rd lowest of 15 · 40% of median 26 2.0
2021 244 13th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 72 2.0
2022 136 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 52 2.0
2023 163 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 63 2.0
2024 165 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 52 2.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3855 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 17% of the irrigation seasons in 1916-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.