← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SPRING CREEK DITCH NO 2

Structure dossier · WDID 1300742 · 1 · STANTON CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:22 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1873-06-01119th most senior of the 1017 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: OELRICH DITCH NO 2 (1873-06-01). Immediately behind: DISSMORE DITCH NO 1 (1873-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
8553.01873-06-011896-03-12 0.80.0 CIRR 61A

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 62 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 24 AF — 39% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1921 64 7th lowest of 12 · 103% of median 66 0.5
1929 60 6th lowest of 12 · 97% of median 39 0.8
1930 44 5th lowest of 12 · 71% of median 29 0.8
1952 78 10th lowest of 12 · 126% of median 50 0.8
1975 105 11th lowest of 12 · 169% of median 64 0.8
1979 35 4th lowest of 12 · 56% of median 25 0.8
1980 73 9th lowest of 12 · 118% of median 47 0.8
1995 159 12th lowest of 12 · 256% of median 100 0.8
1996 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1999 72 8th lowest of 12 · 116% of median 62 0.8
2023 23 2nd lowest of 12 · 37% of median 93 0.2
2024 24 3rd lowest of 12 · 39% of median 93 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 669 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 3% of the irrigation seasons in 1921-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.