← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

1503693

Structure dossier · WDID 1503693 · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:58 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1876-12-3188th most senior of the 704 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CENTENNIAL DITCH (1876-05-19). Immediately behind: DOMESTIC DITCH (1877-05-16).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
9862.01876-12-311893-06-26 1377.41050.0 AIRRIND R2

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 234 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 98 AF — 42% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1982 14,603 15th lowest of 15 · 6241% of median 289 145.0
1983 7,450 13th lowest of 15 · 3184% of median 207 158.0
1984 172 6th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 22 6.9
1985 9,020 14th lowest of 15 · 3855% of median 135 151.0
2015 38 1st lowest of 15 · 16% of median 61 0.3
2016 234 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 366 0.9
2017 109 3rd lowest of 15 · 47% of median 365 0.2
2018 3,310 12th lowest of 15 · 1414% of median 365 46.1
2019 202 7th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 365 5.3
2020 265 9th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 366 2.4
2021 118 4th lowest of 15 · 50% of median 365 0.3
2022 140 5th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 365 0.6
2023 555 11th lowest of 15 · 237% of median 365 2.0
2024 340 10th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 366 2.6
2025 98 2nd lowest of 15 · 42% of median 304 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity partial missing name, structure type, water source
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4743 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 46% of the irrigation seasons in 1977-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.