← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FRANCISCO CHACON DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 1900588 · 1 · MIDDLE FORK PURGATOIRE R · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1866-11-0150th most senior of the 735 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RAMON TORRES DITCH (1866-11-01). Immediately behind: O'NEAL DITCH (1866-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
6149.01866-11-011903-08-10 1.00.0 CIRR 28

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 13 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 220 15th lowest of 15 · 1692% of median 69 8.0
2011 158 14th lowest of 15 · 1215% of median 91 9.0
2012 47 12th lowest of 15 · 362% of median 32 1.0
2013 45 11th lowest of 15 · 346% of median 41 1.1
2014 60 13th lowest of 15 · 462% of median 59 1.0
2015 39 9th lowest of 15 · 300% of median 53 0.9
2016 42 10th lowest of 15 · 323% of median 48 0.9
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 11 0.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 22 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 13 0.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 7 0.0
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 19 0.0
2022 13 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 29 0.8
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 14 0.0
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3890 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 21% of the irrigation seasons in 1936-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.