← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

TEODORO TRUJILLO DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 1900667 · 1 · LUNING ARROYO · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1920-02-15187th most senior of the 735 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GAGLIARDI (MIKE) RESERVOIR (1919-05-01). Immediately behind: ATASCADERO DITCH (1921-01-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
25612.01920-02-151925-01-12 8.00.0 CIRR 242

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 18 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 5 AF — 28% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 34 11th lowest of 15 · 189% of median 15 2.0
2011 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2013 23 9th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 11 2.5
2014 18 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 12 2.0
2015 39 12th lowest of 15 · 217% of median 16 3.0
2016 72 13th lowest of 15 · 400% of median 36 1.8
2017 30 10th lowest of 15 · 167% of median 13 2.2
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2021 115 14th lowest of 15 · 639% of median 49 2.5
2022 10 7th lowest of 15 · 56% of median 21 2.0
2023 193 15th lowest of 15 · 1072% of median 53 2.5
2024 5 6th lowest of 15 · 28% of median 8 1.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.