← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PARMA D

Structure dossier · WDID 2000783 · 1 · PARMA DRAIN · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1919-06-042775th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GETZ SEEPAGE D 4 (1919-06-04). Immediately behind: GETZ SEEPAGE D 4 ALT 1 (1919-06-04).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
32400.253561919-06-041960-01-27 21.00.0 CIRR 1959-11

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 279 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 74 AF — 26% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 1,916 15th lowest of 15 · 687% of median 103 27.7
2008 715 12th lowest of 15 · 256% of median 59 11.9
2009 1,734 14th lowest of 15 · 622% of median 59 36.8
2010 279 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 71 4.6
2011 393 10th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 48 4.5
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2014 763 13th lowest of 15 · 274% of median 73 7.7
2015 30 4th lowest of 15 · 11% of median 92 7.3
2016 695 11th lowest of 15 · 249% of median 62 10.0
2017 385 9th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 71 5.3
2018 2 3rd lowest of 15 · 1% of median 38 0.1
2019 69 5th lowest of 15 · 25% of median 58 2.0
2020 1 2nd lowest of 15 · 0% of median 34 0.1
2023 89 7th lowest of 15 · 32% of median 55 1.5
2024 74 6th lowest of 15 · 26% of median 66 1.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4522 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 33% of the irrigation seasons in 1961-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.