← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ANTONITO D

Structure dossier · WDID 2200504 · 1 · CONEJOS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:17 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1887-04-25148th most senior of the 1764 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: W2956 WELL NO 01 (1886-12-31). Immediately behind: LOBATO AND CORDOBA D (1887-05-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
13629.01887-04-251890-10-03 139.00.0 CIRRDOM 113

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,789 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,484 AF — 83% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 2,400 10th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 15 130.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2013 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2014 1,031 6th lowest of 15 · 58% of median 17 40.0
2015 2,690 11th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 12 139.0
2016 1,789 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 13 139.0
2017 6,514 15th lowest of 15 · 364% of median 39 120.0
2018 754 5th lowest of 15 · 42% of median 11 50.0
2019 2,331 9th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 32 100.0
2020 12 3rd lowest of 15 · 1% of median 3 3.1
2021 4,093 13th lowest of 15 · 229% of median 24 100.0
2022 2,900 12th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 21 139.0
2023 5,266 14th lowest of 15 · 294% of median 41 90.0
2024 149 4th lowest of 15 · 8% of median 4 60.0
2025 1,484 7th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 28 78.8

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.