← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BERNARDO ROMERO D

Structure dossier · WDID 2200513 · 1 · CONEJOS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1870-03-1552nd most senior of the 1764 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TEODORO D NO 2 (1867-06-14). Immediately behind: W1895 WELL NO 10 (1870-05-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
7379.01870-03-151883-10-22 8.760.0 CIRRDOM 35

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 866 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,135 AF — 131% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 636 5th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 41 8.5
2012 586 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 43 8.8
2013 460 2nd lowest of 15 · 53% of median 39 8.8
2014 702 6th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 53 10.1
2015 404 1st lowest of 15 · 47% of median 28 18.0
2016 866 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 74 11.0
2017 1,862 15th lowest of 15 · 215% of median 119 8.8
2018 486 3rd lowest of 15 · 56% of median 33 8.8
2019 1,049 11th lowest of 15 · 121% of median 86 8.8
2020 730 7th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 56 9.8
2021 1,023 9th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 68 9.8
2022 1,253 13th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 64 43.5
2023 1,253 13th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 76 9.9
2024 1,048 10th lowest of 15 · 121% of median 79 8.8
2025 1,135 12th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 88 8.8

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.