Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MEADOWS AUG PLAN
Structure dossier · WDID 2207016 · P · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 22:01 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (c9f7fd8) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
In short
MEADOWS AUG PLAN holds 1 decreed right. We cannot judge whether its rights are in priority: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it. In a median year over its last 6 recorded years it diverts 2 acre-feet.
Assembled from the figures on this page — every number above is checked against them before it is shown (3 checked). The detail, with its method, is in the cards below.
Download this structure
Everything on this page as data you can work with — and a README that makes it citable: the HydroBase snapshot it was built from, the build commit, what every column means, the method behind each derived figure, and that method's stated limits.
⇩ Full record (.zip) Print / save as PDF
Or one table at a time: rights.csv · annual_use.csv · curtailment_now.csv · court_cases.csv · co_parties.csv · call_climatology.csv
What is in the bundle
rights.csv— every decreed right, most senior first, with admin numbers, dates, amounts, uses and case numbers.annual_use.csv— recorded diversion by year, with releases accounted separately.curtailment_now.csv— each right's current priority status and how often it was out across analog years.court_cases.csv— the cases attached to its rights.co_parties.csv— the other structures that were parties to those cases. Not available anywhere else.call_climatology.csv— how often each right has been out of priority by week of season, with confidence intervals and the seasons the record could actually judge.README.txt— provenance, methods, limits, disclaimer, and links back to DWR's own records for verification.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it (administrative). Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1997-12-31 — 1720th most senior of the 1764 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 97CW035 WELL NO 2 (1997-12-31). Immediately behind: USFS QP22A (1905-06-03).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Decreed forWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54056.00000 | 1997-12-31 | 1997-12-31 | 0.033 C | 0.0 | Irrigation, Commercial |
Legal record & documents
No court-case record is cached for this structure.
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 6 years on record)
Years far under the decreed amount? That gap has a name — paper water vs. wet water, explained on this structure.
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 4 AF — 160% of that, and 6th lowest of the 6 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 1 | 1st lowest of 6 · 40% of median | 6 | 0.2 |
| 2004 | 3 | 4th lowest of 6 · 120% of median | 6 | 0.4 |
| 2006 | 1 | 1st lowest of 6 · 40% of median | 7 | 0.1 |
| 2008 | 2 | 3rd lowest of 6 · 80% of median | 3 | 0.5 |
| 2009 | 3 | 4th lowest of 6 · 120% of median | 4 | 0.8 |
| 2010 | 4 | 6th lowest of 6 · 160% of median | 4 | 1.0 |
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | partial | missing water source |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | fragment | 30 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history) |
| record continuity | unknown | record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days) |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.