← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

2300501

Structure dossier · WDID 2300501 · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:43 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Current administration

● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1870-12-311526th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0208598 (1922-05-31). Immediately behind: 2300938 (1879-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
26469.07671870-12-311953-03-24 2.00.0 CIRRDOMSTK

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 190 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1988, came in at 4 AF — 2% of that, and 1st lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1973 849 13th lowest of 13 · 447% of median 214 2.0
1975 460 12th lowest of 13 · 242% of median 117 2.0
1976 51 2nd lowest of 13 · 27% of median 25 1.5
1977 190 6th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 79 2.0
1978 131 4th lowest of 13 · 69% of median 62 2.0
1979 242 9th lowest of 13 · 127% of median 63 2.0
1980 220 8th lowest of 13 · 116% of median 63 2.0
1983 133 5th lowest of 13 · 70% of median 52 2.0
1984 254 10th lowest of 13 · 134% of median 66 2.0
1985 337 11th lowest of 13 · 177% of median 88 2.0
1986 73 3rd lowest of 13 · 38% of median 24 2.0
1987 190 6th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 49 2.0
1988 4 1st lowest of 13 · 2% of median 2 2.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity partial missing name, structure type, water source
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 904 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 28% of the irrigation seasons in 1973-1988 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.