Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WARM SPRINGS CR DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 2300631 · DITCH · HIGH CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 03:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1880-09-01 — 773rd most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2301107 (1880-05-01). Immediately behind: 2301069 (1882-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14536.11202 | 1880-09-01 | 1899-05-22 | 8.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
4 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
CA0341, 91CW0121.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA0341 | 2 | 1899-05-22 | S |
91CW0121 | 2 | 1899-05-22 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 73 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 4 AF — 6% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | 145 | 11th lowest of 15 · 199% of median | 78 | 1.0 |
| 1987 | 139 | 9th lowest of 15 · 190% of median | 57 | 3.0 |
| 1988 | 54 | 7th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 31 | 1.0 |
| 1989 | 36 | 4th lowest of 15 · 49% of median | 20 | 1.0 |
| 1991 | 7 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 10% of median | 9 | 0.5 |
| 1992 | 37 | 5th lowest of 15 · 51% of median | 38 | 0.5 |
| 1995 | 164 | 12th lowest of 15 · 225% of median | 64 | 1.5 |
| 1996 | 170 | 13th lowest of 15 · 233% of median | 66 | 2.8 |
| 1997 | 219 | 14th lowest of 15 · 300% of median | 98 | 2.0 |
| 1998 | 73 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 108 | 0.5 |
| 1999 | 141 | 10th lowest of 15 · 193% of median | 144 | 0.5 |
| 2003 | 276 | 15th lowest of 15 · 378% of median | 38 | 4.0 |
| 2020 | 21 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 29% of median | 18 | 0.6 |
| 2021 | 40 | 6th lowest of 15 · 55% of median | 49 | 0.7 |
| 2022 | 4 | 1st lowest of 15 · 6% of median | 10 | 0.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1531 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 11% of the irrigation seasons in 1957-2022 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.