← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DEE BOIS D 1

Structure dossier · WDID 2700513 · 1 · LA GARITA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1875-06-3015th most senior of the 1304 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LA MAGOTE D NO 2 (1875-06-01). Immediately behind: LA MAGOTES D (1875-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
9312.01875-06-301882-03-23 1.040.0 CIRR 23

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 88 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 110 AF — 125% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2013 14 6th lowest of 15 · 16% of median 13 1.0
2014 132 12th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 67 1.0
2015 268 15th lowest of 15 · 304% of median 131 1.0
2016 103 9th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 54 1.0
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 8 0.0
2019 175 13th lowest of 15 · 199% of median 92 1.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 17 0.0
2021 88 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 54 1.0
2022 43 7th lowest of 15 · 49% of median 38 1.0
2023 120 11th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 71 2.7
2024 183 14th lowest of 15 · 208% of median 74 2.2
2025 110 10th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 74 1.8

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.