← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BENNETT MORTON DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 2800513 · 1 · HOT SPRINGS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1878-05-3047th most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KENNEDY DITCH NO 3 (1878-05-01). Immediately behind: HARRIS DITCH (1878-05-31).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16192.103771878-05-301904-04-29 0.880.0 CIRR 37
16192.136591887-05-251904-04-29 0.60.0 CIRR 92

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 527 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 294 6th lowest of 15 · 56% of median 162 1.7
2008 567 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 108 4.5
2009 587 11th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 106 5.3
2010 382 7th lowest of 15 · 72% of median 91 5.2
2011 527 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 108 5.3
2012 288 5th lowest of 15 · 55% of median 177 2.8
2013 537 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 176 2.8
2014 951 12th lowest of 15 · 180% of median 157 5.8
2015 1,243 14th lowest of 15 · 236% of median 202 6.5
2016 1,007 13th lowest of 15 · 191% of median 186 7.0
2017 1,823 15th lowest of 15 · 346% of median 194 12.5
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.