← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CLARK NO 3 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 2800529 · 1 · TOMICHI CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1888-06-01133rd most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CLARK NO 2 DITCH (1888-06-01). Immediately behind: GUENTHER NO 2 DITCH (1888-06-01).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16192.140321888-06-011904-04-29 2.50.0 CIRR 98
28311.140321888-06-011943-04-19 7.50.0 CIRR 255
54786.140321888-06-012000-12-31 0.250.0 CSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 953 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,162 AF — 122% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 1,556 12th lowest of 15 · 163% of median 86 11.3
2010 948 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 104 9.9
2011 1,709 14th lowest of 15 · 179% of median 97 15.0
2012 714 4th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 58 11.5
2013 744 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 72 7.2
2014 793 6th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 67 6.9
2015 1,374 11th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 98 12.0
2016 2,074 15th lowest of 15 · 218% of median 126 9.3
2017 1,702 13th lowest of 15 · 179% of median 73 21.6
2018 712 3rd lowest of 15 · 75% of median 68 9.3
2019 509 2nd lowest of 15 · 53% of median 52 8.0
2020 999 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 79 7.5
2021 382 1st lowest of 15 · 40% of median 45 5.8
2022 953 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 91 6.2
2024 1,162 10th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 118 5.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.