Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HAWES-BERGEN-GILBERTSON
Structure dossier · WDID 2800580 · 1 · TOMICHI CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1887-04-20 — 126th most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GILBERTSON NO 2 DITCH (1887-04-20). Immediately behind: MORAN DITCH (1887-05-01).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16192.13624 | 1887-04-20 | 1904-04-29 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 89 |
| 16192.14844 | 1890-08-22 | 1904-04-29 | 3.1 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 108 |
| 38822.14844 | 1890-08-22 | 1961-12-15 | 12.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 378 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 507 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 149 AF — 29% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 538 | 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 110 | 4.4 |
| 2010 | 779 | 13th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 108 | 6.3 |
| 2011 | 667 | 11th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 127 | 4.1 |
| 2012 | 198 | 6th lowest of 15 · 39% of median | 68 | 2.3 |
| 2013 | 507 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 84 | 4.3 |
| 2014 | 627 | 10th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | 63 | 5.1 |
| 2015 | 3,123 | 14th lowest of 15 · 616% of median | 156 | 13.6 |
| 2016 | 4,641 | 15th lowest of 15 · 915% of median | 182 | 13.6 |
| 2017 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2022 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 5 | 0.0 |
| 2023 | 460 | 7th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 51 | 10.1 |
| 2024 | 714 | 12th lowest of 15 · 141% of median | 66 | 6.0 |
| 2025 | 149 | 5th lowest of 15 · 29% of median | 75 | 1.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.