← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WOOD AND GEE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 2800715 · 1 · TOMICHI CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:28 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1884-06-01105th most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LEWIS STURGIS AUSTIN DITCH (1884-06-01). Immediately behind: HAZARD DITCH (1885-05-31).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16192.125711884-06-011904-04-29 5.40.0 CIRR 75
28311.125711884-06-011943-04-19 21.60.0 CIRR 239

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 908 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,202 AF — 132% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 1,644 15th lowest of 15 · 181% of median 98 15.1
2012 217 1st lowest of 15 · 24% of median 59 4.3
2013 1,360 14th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 101 10.2
2014 745 4th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 46 15.6
2015 933 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 66 9.8
2016 817 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 88 9.1
2017 678 3rd lowest of 15 · 75% of median 62 11.6
2018 1,012 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 88 7.8
2019 908 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 46 12.0
2020 757 5th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 52 10.2
2021 988 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 51 13.9
2022 1,267 13th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 70 10.5
2023 519 2nd lowest of 15 · 57% of median 35 10.9
2024 888 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 49 12.8
2025 1,202 12th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 68 12.8

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.