← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WOOD AND GEE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 2800715 · 1 · TOMICHI CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:28 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1884-06-01 — 105th most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LEWIS STURGIS AUSTIN DITCH (1884-06-01). Immediately behind: HAZARD DITCH (1885-05-31).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16192.12571 | 1884-06-01 | 1904-04-29 | 5.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 75 |
| 28311.12571 | 1884-06-01 | 1943-04-19 | 21.6 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 239 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 908 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,202 AF — 132% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,644 | 15th lowest of 15 · 181% of median | 98 | 15.1 |
| 2012 | 217 | 1st lowest of 15 · 24% of median | 59 | 4.3 |
| 2013 | 1,360 | 14th lowest of 15 · 150% of median | 101 | 10.2 |
| 2014 | 745 | 4th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 46 | 15.6 |
| 2015 | 933 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 66 | 9.8 |
| 2016 | 817 | 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 88 | 9.1 |
| 2017 | 678 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 62 | 11.6 |
| 2018 | 1,012 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 88 | 7.8 |
| 2019 | 908 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 46 | 12.0 |
| 2020 | 757 | 5th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 52 | 10.2 |
| 2021 | 988 | 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 51 | 13.9 |
| 2022 | 1,267 | 13th lowest of 15 · 140% of median | 70 | 10.5 |
| 2023 | 519 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 57% of median | 35 | 10.9 |
| 2024 | 888 | 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 49 | 12.8 |
| 2025 | 1,202 | 12th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 68 | 12.8 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.