← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ROCK CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 2800887 · 1 · ROCK CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1911-06-10765th most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DUNCAN DITCH (1910-05-15). Immediately behind: ERNEST VOUGA DITCH (1918-06-12).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
35168.22441911-06-101956-04-16 15.00.0 CIRR 342

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 510 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 342 AF — 67% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1973 493 5th lowest of 11 · 97% of median 72 3.5
1974 849 10th lowest of 11 · 166% of median 98 8.0
1989 510 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 177 2.0
1990 684 8th lowest of 11 · 134% of median 191 2.5
1991 793 9th lowest of 11 · 156% of median 178 3.0
1992 994 11th lowest of 11 · 195% of median 144 6.0
1993 611 7th lowest of 11 · 120% of median 173 3.5
1994 251 1st lowest of 11 · 49% of median 144 2.7
2015 337 2nd lowest of 11 · 66% of median 86 2.0
2017 424 4th lowest of 11 · 83% of median 94 3.0
2019 342 3rd lowest of 11 · 67% of median 56 5.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1413 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 14% of the irrigation seasons in 1973-2019 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.