← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BEIGHLEY SEEPAGE D NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 2900521 · 5 · RIO BLANCO · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 19:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1961-05-03332nd most senior of the 853 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BEIGHLEY SEEPAGE D NO 4 (1961-05-02). Immediately behind: BEIGHLEY NO 1 DITCH (1961-05-04).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
41016.406651961-05-031968-12-19 3.00.0 CIRRDOM 68-180

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 101 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1996 101 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 166 0.5
1997 299 15th lowest of 15 · 296% of median 93 2.0
1998 203 11th lowest of 15 · 201% of median 87 1.5
1999 237 12th lowest of 15 · 235% of median 89 2.0
2000 124 9th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 99 1.0
2001 294 14th lowest of 15 · 291% of median 106 2.4
2002 65 5th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 136 0.4
2003 90 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 151 0.4
2004 100 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 151 0.5
2005 251 13th lowest of 15 · 248% of median 95 2.4
2006 199 10th lowest of 15 · 197% of median 94 2.0
2007 58 4th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 42 1.0
2008 17 3rd lowest of 15 · 17% of median 71 0.2
2009 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 9 0.0
2010 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.