Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BEIGHLEY SEEPAGE D NO 2
Structure dossier · WDID 2900522 · 5 · RIO BLANCO · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1961-05-01 — 328th most senior of the 853 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MARTINEZ PIPELINE AND D (1961-04-01). Immediately behind: BEIGHLEY SEEPAGE D NO 5 (1961-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41016.40663 | 1961-05-01 | 1968-12-19 | 4.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | 68-176 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 110 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 261 | 12th lowest of 15 · 237% of median | 93 | 2.2 |
| 1996 | 104 | 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 159 | 0.5 |
| 1997 | 325 | 15th lowest of 15 · 296% of median | 93 | 2.5 |
| 1998 | 288 | 14th lowest of 15 · 262% of median | 88 | 2.0 |
| 1999 | 266 | 13th lowest of 15 · 242% of median | 89 | 2.5 |
| 2000 | 124 | 9th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 99 | 1.0 |
| 2001 | 241 | 10th lowest of 15 · 219% of median | 86 | 2.0 |
| 2002 | 94 | 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 136 | 2.0 |
| 2003 | 95 | 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 151 | 0.4 |
| 2004 | 110 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 160 | 0.5 |
| 2005 | 257 | 11th lowest of 15 · 234% of median | 118 | 2.4 |
| 2006 | 101 | 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 67 | 1.2 |
| 2007 | 75 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 63 | 1.0 |
| 2009 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 9 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 10 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.