Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ECHO WASTE WATER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 2900591 · 1 · ECHO CANYON · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1929-06-30 — 201st most senior of the 853 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FAWN GULCH DITCH (1926-05-01). Immediately behind: ECHO RESERVOIR FEEDER D (1929-08-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29035.0 | 1929-06-30 | 1962-04-19 | 3.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | #292 |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
CA0308.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA0308 | 1 | 1962-04-19 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 512 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2007, came in at 70 AF — 14% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 772 | 15th lowest of 15 · 151% of median | 145 | 4.6 |
| 1994 | 270 | 5th lowest of 15 · 53% of median | 85 | 5.4 |
| 1995 | 563 | 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 118 | 4.8 |
| 1996 | 577 | 11th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 141 | 7.3 |
| 1997 | 625 | 12th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 124 | 7.0 |
| 1998 | 526 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 99 | 4.6 |
| 1999 | 686 | 14th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 132 | 7.5 |
| 2000 | 391 | 6th lowest of 15 · 76% of median | 65 | 7.0 |
| 2001 | 474 | 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 85 | 7.6 |
| 2002 | 119 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 23% of median | 119 | 2.5 |
| 2003 | 37 | 1st lowest of 15 · 7% of median | 76 | 0.5 |
| 2004 | 217 | 4th lowest of 15 · 42% of median | 135 | 3.2 |
| 2005 | 512 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 178 | 4.6 |
| 2006 | 675 | 13th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 118 | 7.2 |
| 2007 | 70 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 14% of median | 54 | 1.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 4436 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 49% of the irrigation seasons in 1965-2007 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.