← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HEDGES-CLARK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3001120 · 1 · PINE GULCH · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1904-08-11 — 390th most senior of the 2277 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: EAST MESA DITCH (1904-07-19). Immediately behind: WEST LATERAL DITCH (1905-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19946.0 | 1904-08-11 | 1923-11-08 | 4.2 | 0.0 | C | IRR | F-62 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 174 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 208 AF — 120% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 249 | 11th lowest of 15 · 143% of median | 130 | 2.5 |
| 2012 | 198 | 9th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 98 | 2.0 |
| 2013 | 32 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 18% of median | 52 | 0.5 |
| 2014 | 135 | 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 121 | 1.0 |
| 2015 | 109 | 4th lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 119 | 0.8 |
| 2016 | 258 | 12th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | 132 | 1.5 |
| 2017 | 364 | 15th lowest of 15 · 209% of median | 116 | 2.0 |
| 2018 | 94 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 58 | 1.2 |
| 2019 | 350 | 14th lowest of 15 · 201% of median | 125 | 2.0 |
| 2020 | 174 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 93 | 2.5 |
| 2021 | 28 | 1st lowest of 15 · 16% of median | 69 | 0.3 |
| 2022 | 138 | 6th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | 69 | 2.5 |
| 2023 | 319 | 13th lowest of 15 · 183% of median | 127 | 2.8 |
| 2024 | 174 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 111 | 1.0 |
| 2025 | 208 | 10th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 98 | 2.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.