Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SPRING DITCH & PIPELINE
Structure dossier · WDID 3001225 · 1 · TRUMBLE DRAW · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1921-06-23 — 766th most senior of the 2277 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MAYN HOMESTEAD SPRINGS (1910-04-01). Immediately behind: SPRING DITCH & PIPELINE AP (1921-06-23).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44194.26106 | 1921-06-23 | 1971-12-31 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 19 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 28 | 11th lowest of 15 · 147% of median | 97 | 0.2 |
| 2012 | 17 | 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 107 | 0.1 |
| 2013 | 15 | 6th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | 92 | 0.1 |
| 2014 | 10 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 53% of median | 69 | 0.1 |
| 2015 | 11 | 4th lowest of 15 · 58% of median | 82 | 0.1 |
| 2016 | 25 | 10th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 137 | 0.1 |
| 2017 | 28 | 11th lowest of 15 · 147% of median | 154 | 0.1 |
| 2018 | 12 | 5th lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 84 | 0.1 |
| 2019 | 22 | 9th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 124 | 0.1 |
| 2020 | 19 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 114 | 0.1 |
| 2021 | 9 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 47% of median | 69 | 0.1 |
| 2022 | 38 | 13th lowest of 15 · 200% of median | 183 | 0.2 |
| 2023 | 138 | 15th lowest of 15 · 726% of median | 168 | 0.5 |
| 2024 | 76 | 14th lowest of 15 · 400% of median | 174 | 0.5 |
| 2025 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 24 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.