Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LAMKE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3001313 · 8 · SALT CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1977-06-20 — 999th most senior of the 2277 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WHITE DOME LAKE (1977-03-09). Immediately behind: ALBRECHT DITCH (1977-07-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46557.0 | 1977-06-20 | 1977-12-31 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRSTK |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 0 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2001, came in at 0 AF — —% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 10 | 0.0 |
| 1985 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 21 | 0.0 |
| 1986 | 21 | 14th lowest of 15 · —% of median | 38 | 0.5 |
| 1987 | 38 | 15th lowest of 15 · —% of median | 53 | 0.5 |
| 1988 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 14 | 0.0 |
| 1989 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 14 | 0.0 |
| 1990 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 11 | 0.0 |
| 1991 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 12 | 0.0 |
| 1992 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 9 | 0.0 |
| 1993 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 19 | 0.0 |
| 1994 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 22 | 0.0 |
| 1995 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 22 | 0.0 |
| 1996 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 18 | 0.0 |
| 1997 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 21 | 0.0 |
| 2001 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median | 21 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.