Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

JONES WASTE WATER DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3001346 · 1 · COTTONWOOD GULCH · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:41 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1980-06-02 — 1069th most senior of the 2277 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DYAR-MCCOY DIVERSION STA (1980-05-01). Immediately behind: WATSON PUMP (1980-06-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
47635.01980-06-021980-12-31 0.50.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 43 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 85 AF — 198% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 58 11th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 124 0.4
2012 23 5th lowest of 15 · 54% of median 50 0.4
2013 21 4th lowest of 15 · 49% of median 52 0.4
2014 27 7th lowest of 15 · 63% of median 72 0.3
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 23 0.0
2016 10 2nd lowest of 15 · 23% of median 42 0.2
2017 87 13th lowest of 15 · 202% of median 140 0.8
2018 19 3rd lowest of 15 · 44% of median 72 0.2
2019 96 14th lowest of 15 · 223% of median 125 0.6
2020 57 9th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 105 0.5
2021 24 6th lowest of 15 · 56% of median 81 0.2
2022 57 9th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 93 0.5
2023 43 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 91 0.5
2024 130 15th lowest of 15 · 302% of median 136 0.6
2025 85 12th lowest of 15 · 198% of median 117 0.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4041 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 42% of the irrigation seasons in 1981-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.