← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WATSON WASTEWATER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3001470 · 1 · SALT CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:47 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1974-06-01 — 1342nd most senior of the 2277 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HANSEN DITCH AP (1967-05-01). Immediately behind: WATSON WASTEWATER DIT AP2 (1974-06-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50769.45442 | 1974-06-01 | 1989-12-31 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRFIS |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 130 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 150 AF — 115% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 130 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 148 | 0.5 |
| 2012 | 150 | 12th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 156 | 0.6 |
| 2013 | 89 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 155 | 0.4 |
| 2014 | 146 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 144 | 0.6 |
| 2015 | 139 | 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median | 144 | 0.5 |
| 2016 | 181 | 15th lowest of 15 · 139% of median | 142 | 1.0 |
| 2017 | 140 | 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 146 | 0.5 |
| 2018 | 76 | 1st lowest of 15 · 58% of median | 107 | 0.5 |
| 2019 | 124 | 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 128 | 0.6 |
| 2020 | 152 | 14th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 158 | 0.5 |
| 2021 | 95 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 142 | 0.8 |
| 2022 | 114 | 4th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 156 | 0.6 |
| 2023 | 129 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 152 | 0.5 |
| 2024 | 121 | 5th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 134 | 0.5 |
| 2025 | 150 | 12th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 153 | 0.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.