Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NAEGELIN LAKE
Structure dossier · WDID 3003625 · 3 · JUNCTION CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 05:26 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1906-04-04 — 1002nd most senior of the 2277 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: YUKON MINE WELL (1977-08-31). Immediately behind: GROB PONDS SUPPLY SPRING (1952-12-31).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46751.20547 | 1906-04-04 | 1978-12-31 | 316.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRRECFIRSTK | |
| 55205.0 | 2001-02-22 | 2001-12-31 | 50.0 | 0.0 | A | COMDOMAUG |
Legal record & documents
7 decreed actions on record across
5 court cases:
14CW3038, 08CW0018, 01CW0014, W1838, 01CW0107.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
14CW3038 | 2 | 2001-12-31 | S |
08CW0018 | 2 | 2001-12-31 | S |
01CW0014 | 1 | 2001-12-31 | S |
W1838 | 1 | 1978-12-31 | S |
01CW0107 | 1 | 1978-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 228 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 140 AF — 61% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 455 | 13th lowest of 15 · 200% of median | 123 | 3.6 |
| 2012 | 119 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 52% of median | 51 | 2.6 |
| 2013 | 291 | 10th lowest of 15 · 128% of median | 105 | 5.7 |
| 2014 | 199 | 5th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 103 | 1.8 |
| 2015 | 490 | 14th lowest of 15 · 215% of median | 124 | 4.8 |
| 2016 | 199 | 5th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 78 | 3.8 |
| 2017 | 348 | 11th lowest of 15 · 153% of median | 108 | 9.3 |
| 2018 | 258 | 9th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 113 | 4.0 |
| 2019 | 210 | 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 59 | 4.5 |
| 2020 | 197 | 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 129 | 3.5 |
| 2021 | 582 | 15th lowest of 15 · 255% of median | 179 | 6.5 |
| 2022 | 228 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 53 | 5.0 |
| 2023 | 107 | 1st lowest of 15 · 47% of median | 61 | 2.5 |
| 2024 | 425 | 12th lowest of 15 · 186% of median | 108 | 3.6 |
| 2025 | 140 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 61% of median | 31 | 3.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1432 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 8% of the irrigation seasons in 1943-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.