Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DANNELS-SPG CR WW DIVR

Structure dossier · WDID 3100614 · 1 · JONES ARROYO · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:55 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1902-06-01 — 450th most senior of the 1037 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COOPERS DUNHAM SPRING D (1884-01-03). Immediately behind: PINCKERT DITCH (1914-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44194.191441902-06-011971-12-31 2.00.0 CIRRSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 49 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2009, came in at 88 AF — 180% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1995 69 11th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 85 0.8
1996 49 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 65 0.8
1997 45 5th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 66 0.5
1998 70 12th lowest of 15 · 143% of median 101 0.5
1999 28 3rd lowest of 15 · 57% of median 59 0.4
2000 45 5th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 110 0.4
2001 14 1st lowest of 15 · 29% of median 43 0.3
2002 21 2nd lowest of 15 · 43% of median 43 0.3
2003 66 10th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 86 0.5
2004 143 15th lowest of 15 · 292% of median 129 1.0
2005 65 9th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 88 0.8
2006 43 4th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 74 0.8
2007 46 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 82 0.5
2008 102 14th lowest of 15 · 208% of median 123 0.8
2009 88 13th lowest of 15 · 180% of median 131 0.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3992 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 48% of the irrigation seasons in 1971-2009 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.