Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MANN DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3100712 · 1 · DRY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1910-12-31 — 527th most senior of the 1037 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: UTE MUNICIPAL PL (1868-07-25). Immediately behind: MARTINEZ DITCH (1930-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
46020.222791910-12-311976-12-31 1.00.0 CIRRSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 54 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2017, came in at 26 AF — 48% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2003 82 13th lowest of 15 · 152% of median 91 1.0
2004 138 15th lowest of 15 · 256% of median 132 1.2
2005 67 10th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 128 0.9
2006 30 3rd lowest of 15 · 56% of median 74 0.4
2007 65 9th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 111 0.5
2008 54 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 124 0.3
2009 33 4th lowest of 15 · 61% of median 152 0.2
2010 23 1st lowest of 15 · 43% of median 112 0.2
2011 38 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 135 0.3
2012 47 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 130 0.5
2013 34 5th lowest of 15 · 63% of median 100 0.3
2014 98 14th lowest of 15 · 182% of median 146 0.8
2015 75 12th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 155 0.7
2016 67 10th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 138 0.4
2017 26 2nd lowest of 15 · 48% of median 107 0.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.