Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

KIRKEENG DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3200601 · 1 · HARTMAN DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:38 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1898-04-20 — 140th most senior of the 638 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HOLADAY NO 1 DITCH (1898-04-15). Immediately behind: CHARLES MATTSON DITCH (1898-04-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
17642.01898-04-201962-08-14 0.50.0 CIRR 62-19

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 59 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 38 AF — 64% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 103 14th lowest of 15 · 175% of median 124 0.6
2012 72 11th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 149 0.4
2013 38 2nd lowest of 15 · 64% of median 99 0.3
2014 63 10th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 146 0.5
2015 108 15th lowest of 15 · 183% of median 175 0.5
2016 58 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 148 0.2
2017 80 13th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 138 0.4
2018 60 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 135 0.5
2019 75 12th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 124 0.4
2020 56 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 157 0.2
2021 29 1st lowest of 15 · 49% of median 118 0.4
2022 48 5th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 127 0.2
2023 43 4th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 110 0.2
2024 59 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 158 0.2
2025 38 2nd lowest of 15 · 64% of median 159 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 8160 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 62% of the irrigation seasons in 1964-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.