← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PIERCE PUMP

Structure dossier · WDID 3200933 · 8 · ALKALI CANYON · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:53 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1955-12-31492nd most senior of the 638 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: C AND G DITCH (1952-05-20). Immediately behind: WRIGHT DITCH (1972-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
52960.387151955-12-311995-12-31 0.10.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 10 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 4 AF — 40% of that, and 4th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1997 18 10th lowest of 13 · 180% of median 94 0.1
1998 36 13th lowest of 13 · 360% of median 94 0.2
1999 8 6th lowest of 13 · 80% of median 47 0.1
2000 0 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2001 0 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2002 0 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2003 11 8th lowest of 13 · 110% of median 64 0.1
2004 4 4th lowest of 13 · 40% of median 48 0.1
2006 11 8th lowest of 13 · 110% of median 118 0.1
2007 21 12th lowest of 13 · 210% of median 107 0.1
2008 18 10th lowest of 13 · 180% of median 94 0.1
2009 10 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 55 0.1
2010 4 4th lowest of 13 · 40% of median 41 0.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 780 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 27% of the irrigation seasons in 1997-2010 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.