← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WEBER RESERVOIR INLET D
Structure dossier · WDID 3400577 · 1 · MIDDLE MANCOS RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1892-05-15 — 198th most senior of the 495 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CRYSTAL CREEK DITCH (1890-05-15). Immediately behind: MANCOS CANYON DITCH (1892-06-12).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15476.0 | 1892-05-15 | 1893-04-28 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-45 |
| 15824.13971 | 1888-04-01 | 1933-12-18 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-51 |
| 22766.0 | 1912-05-01 | 1933-12-18 | 4.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-56 |
| 26783.0 | 1923-05-01 | 1933-12-18 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-58 |
| 26783.00001 | 1889-05-15 | 1893-04-28 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-36 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 684 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 453 AF — 66% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 953 | 11th lowest of 15 · 139% of median | 210 | 9.5 |
| 2012 | 246 | 1st lowest of 15 · 36% of median | 166 | 5.7 |
| 2013 | 660 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 219 | 9.3 |
| 2014 | 748 | 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 207 | 8.1 |
| 2015 | 607 | 5th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 302 | 7.5 |
| 2016 | 1,249 | 15th lowest of 15 · 183% of median | 271 | 9.3 |
| 2017 | 1,051 | 13th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 217 | 10.6 |
| 2018 | 383 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 224 | 3.5 |
| 2019 | 1,114 | 14th lowest of 15 · 163% of median | 272 | 10.2 |
| 2020 | 684 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 221 | 8.6 |
| 2021 | 410 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 217 | 3.7 |
| 2022 | 1,002 | 12th lowest of 15 · 146% of median | 365 | 7.5 |
| 2023 | 835 | 10th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 365 | 9.5 |
| 2024 | 639 | 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 366 | 8.2 |
| 2025 | 453 | 4th lowest of 15 · 66% of median | 304 | 7.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.