← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SOUTH SWAMP D
Structure dossier · WDID 3500576 · 1 · TRINCHERA CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:37 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1867-05-01 — 34th most senior of the 709 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORTH SWAMP D (1867-05-01). Immediately behind: NEWTON 2-MILL APD (1867-05-01).
Decreed rights (10)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6330.0 | 1867-05-01 | 1900-11-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 61/2 |
| 8157.0 | 1872-05-01 | 1900-11-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 181/2 |
| 8917.0 | 1874-05-31 | 1899-12-15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 27 |
| 11109.0 | 1880-05-31 | 1899-12-15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 35 |
| 13818.0 | 1887-10-31 | 1899-12-15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 39 |
| 21376.0 | 1908-07-11 | 1915-01-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 71 |
| 22156.0 | 1910-08-30 | 1915-01-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 79 |
| 22320.0 | 1911-02-10 | 1915-01-04 | 53.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 81 |
| 22324.0 | 1911-02-14 | 1915-01-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 82 |
| 22377.0 | 1911-04-08 | 1915-01-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRR | 95 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 151 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 203 | 9th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 174 | 2.0 |
| 1991 | 252 | 13th lowest of 15 · 167% of median | 203 | 1.0 |
| 1992 | 297 | 15th lowest of 15 · 197% of median | 213 | 3.5 |
| 1993 | 231 | 10th lowest of 15 · 153% of median | 196 | 1.0 |
| 1994 | 232 | 11th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 195 | 10.0 |
| 1995 | 244 | 12th lowest of 15 · 162% of median | 237 | 2.0 |
| 1996 | 102 | 7th lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 179 | 1.0 |
| 1997 | 254 | 14th lowest of 15 · 168% of median | 227 | 1.0 |
| 1998 | 74 | 5th lowest of 15 · 49% of median | 61 | 1.0 |
| 1999 | 151 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 282 | 0.5 |
| 2000 | 55 | 4th lowest of 15 · 36% of median | 146 | 0.5 |
| 2001 | 96 | 6th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 140 | 1.0 |
| 2002 | 15 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 10% of median | 78 | 0.1 |
| 2011 | 8 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 5% of median | 122 | 0.1 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.