← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

TRINCHERA GARLAND CANAL

Structure dossier · WDID 3500581 · 1 · TRINCHERA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:22 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1864-05-0126th most senior of the 709 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TRINCHERA CANAL (1864-05-01). Immediately behind: TRINCHERA HIGHLINE CANAL (1864-05-01).

Decreed rights (14)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
5235.01864-05-011899-12-15 0.00.0 CIRR 5
6360.01867-05-311899-12-15 3.00.0 CIRR 6
6528.01867-11-151900-11-26 0.00.0 CIRR 81/2
7091.01869-05-311899-12-15 0.00.0 CIRR 9
9252.01875-05-011899-12-15 0.00.0 CIRR 29
10743.01879-05-311899-12-15 0.00.0 CIRR 34
13858.01887-12-101899-12-15 0.00.0 CIRR 40
20791.01906-12-041915-01-04 0.00.0 AIRR 94
21140.01907-11-181915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRR 671/2
21376.01908-07-111915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRR 70
21453.01908-09-261915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRR 72
21509.01908-11-211915-01-04 171.890.0 CIRR 74
22254.01910-12-061915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRR 80
22377.01911-04-081915-01-04 0.00.0 AIRR 95

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,788 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 2,236 AF — 80% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 591 2nd lowest of 15 · 21% of median 123 13.7
2011 381 1st lowest of 15 · 14% of median 123 17.2
2012 2,092 6th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 214 21.0
2013 766 3rd lowest of 15 · 28% of median 146 21.5
2014 1,989 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 129 50.6
2015 3,873 13th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 145 83.8
2016 2,788 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 107 96.7
2017 6,607 15th lowest of 15 · 237% of median 200 101.0
2018 3,838 12th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 160 31.5
2019 4,141 14th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 157 51.2
2020 1,040 4th lowest of 15 · 37% of median 220 3.0
2021 3,289 11th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 186 97.4
2022 3,121 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 179 36.0
2023 2,881 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 180 35.0
2024 2,236 7th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 94 57.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.