← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

NORTH ZAPATA CREEK PIPELINE

Structure dossier · WDID 3500663 · 7 · NORTH ZAPATA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1873-04-0137th most senior of the 709 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MEYER D (1873-04-01). Immediately behind: SOUTH ZAPATA CREEK PIPELINE (1873-04-01).

Decreed rights (13)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
8492.01873-04-011895-03-26 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 1A
10683.01879-04-011895-03-26 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 5A
11779.01882-04-011895-03-26 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 9A
13270.01886-05-011895-03-26 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 11A
14246.01889-01-011895-03-26 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 19A
19237.149751890-12-311915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 55
19237.15341891-12-311915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 57
19237.188091901-07-011915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 61
21279.01908-04-051915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 68
21599.01909-02-191915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 75
21650.01909-04-111915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 76
21650.01909-04-111915-01-04 0.00.0 CIRRCOMRECAUG 77
48577.482791982-03-081983-12-31 12.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,763 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,914 AF — 109% of that, and 6th lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
1988 no recorded volume 46 0
1989 1,667 4th lowest of 9 · 95% of median 260 6.7
1990 3,876 9th lowest of 9 · 220% of median 260 25.0
1999 1,090 2nd lowest of 9 · 62% of median 83 12.0
2000 1,542 3rd lowest of 9 · 88% of median 155 13.4
2001 2,350 7th lowest of 9 · 133% of median 155 12.0
2020 580 1st lowest of 9 · 33% of median 170 8.2
2021 2,987 8th lowest of 9 · 169% of median 216 7.0
2022 1,763 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median 155 19.1
2024 1,914 6th lowest of 9 · 109% of median 193 10.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 13 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1647 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 21% of the irrigation seasons in 1988-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.