← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BUMGARNER NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3600546 · 1 · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1910-06-05352nd most senior of the 1247 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DRY CREEK NO 2 DITCH (1910-05-31). Immediately behind: HOAGLAND NO 1 RESERVOIR (1910-12-14).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
32075.22071910-06-051952-03-10 4.580.0 CIRR 309

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 90 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 114 AF — 127% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 156 13th lowest of 15 · 173% of median 83 3.1
2010 54 4th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 39 1.9
2011 172 14th lowest of 15 · 191% of median 52 4.3
2012 25 2nd lowest of 15 · 28% of median 19 1.0
2013 329 15th lowest of 15 · 366% of median 66 5.3
2014 118 10th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 33 2.0
2015 31 3rd lowest of 15 · 34% of median 32 1.1
2016 147 12th lowest of 15 · 163% of median 34 3.2
2017 127 11th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 59 1.5
2019 21 1st lowest of 15 · 23% of median 34 0.5
2020 76 7th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 36 1.4
2021 67 6th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 37 1.4
2022 60 5th lowest of 15 · 67% of median 29 1.4
2023 90 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 45 1.4
2024 114 9th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 45 1.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.