← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SONDREGGER NO 5 AP HDGT 3

Structure dossier · WDID 3601096 · 1 · BUSHEE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1901-07-01332nd most senior of the 1247 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SONDREGGER NO 5 DITCH HGT 2 (1901-07-01). Immediately behind: SONDREGGER NO 5 DITCH AP (1901-07-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
32075.188091901-07-011952-03-10 0.00.0 CIRRRECFISSTKAUGOTHWLD 280, 280&2

Recorded use (last 9 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 35 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 26 AF — 74% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2002 113 9th lowest of 9 · 323% of median 46 1.3
2017 47 8th lowest of 9 · 134% of median 168 0.2
2018 41 6th lowest of 9 · 117% of median 165 0.3
2019 31 3rd lowest of 9 · 89% of median 178 0.2
2020 35 4th lowest of 9 · 100% of median 123 0.2
2021 43 7th lowest of 9 · 123% of median 171 0.2
2022 35 4th lowest of 9 · 100% of median 170 0.2
2023 23 1st lowest of 9 · 66% of median 153 0.1
2024 26 2nd lowest of 9 · 74% of median 166 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1340 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 28% of the irrigation seasons in 2002-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.