← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BRADSHAW NO 2 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3800551 · 1 · HUNTER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1881-05-25 — 699th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HEUSCHKEL W 1 NO 43874 (1949-04-30). Immediately behind: OVERFLOW & LAUGHRAN DITCH (1882-05-15).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36396.11468 | 1881-05-25 | 1952-10-24 | 0.624 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | 487 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 151 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2000, came in at 91 AF — 60% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1982 | 48 | 1st lowest of 15 · 32% of median | 122 | 0.2 |
| 1983 | 303 | 11th lowest of 15 · 201% of median | 153 | 1.0 |
| 1984 | 67 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 44% of median | 170 | 0.2 |
| 1985 | 67 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 44% of median | 170 | 0.2 |
| 1990 | 67 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 44% of median | 61 | 0.6 |
| 1991 | 392 | 14th lowest of 15 · 260% of median | 365 | 0.6 |
| 1992 | 363 | 13th lowest of 15 · 240% of median | 366 | 0.5 |
| 1993 | 513 | 15th lowest of 15 · 340% of median | 365 | 1.1 |
| 1994 | 325 | 12th lowest of 15 · 215% of median | 304 | 0.6 |
| 1995 | 156 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 180 | 0.5 |
| 1996 | 97 | 6th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 166 | 0.5 |
| 1997 | 151 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 304 | 0.5 |
| 1998 | 170 | 10th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 172 | 0.5 |
| 1999 | 128 | 7th lowest of 15 · 85% of median | 144 | 0.4 |
| 2000 | 91 | 5th lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 184 | 0.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.