← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MARTIN DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 3800858 · 1 · WEST SOPRIS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:49 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1885-06-16178th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KEETON & EMISON DITCH AP (1885-06-15). Immediately behind: SOMMERS DITCH (1885-06-20).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12951.01885-06-161889-05-11 0.50.0 CIRR 125
13294.01886-05-251889-05-11 0.20.0 CIRR 150
30941.264181922-05-011936-08-25 0.630.0 CIRR 414E

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 264 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 439 AF — 166% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 321 9th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 153 1.3
2008 371 12th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 168 1.3
2009 344 11th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 153 1.3
2010 335 10th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 177 1.3
2011 264 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 170 1.0
2012 61 2nd lowest of 15 · 23% of median 63 0.6
2013 193 7th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 107 1.0
2014 145 3rd lowest of 15 · 55% of median 74 1.0
2015 161 5th lowest of 15 · 61% of median 82 1.0
2017 172 6th lowest of 15 · 65% of median 123 1.0
2019 155 4th lowest of 15 · 59% of median 53 1.5
2020 43 1st lowest of 15 · 16% of median 45 0.5
2022 428 14th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 167 1.3
2023 375 13th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 154 1.3
2024 439 15th lowest of 15 · 166% of median 179 1.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.