Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MOCKLIN DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3801333 · 1 · ROARING FORK RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:54 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1964-03-01 — 3624th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TIE CAMP DITCH (1961-01-01). Immediately behind: CM 39 SPRING (1973-01-09).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
53325.416981964-03-011996-12-31 0.40.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 20 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 21 AF — 105% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 53 13th lowest of 15 · 265% of median 93 0.4
2008 70 14th lowest of 15 · 350% of median 184 0.3
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 61 0.0
2013 16 7th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 365 0.2
2014 93 15th lowest of 15 · 465% of median 365 0.4
2015 2 4th lowest of 15 · 10% of median 304 0.2
2016 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 61 0.0
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 365 0.0
2018 2 4th lowest of 15 · 10% of median 365 0.0
2019 37 12th lowest of 15 · 185% of median 365 0.3
2020 20 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 366 0.0
2021 15 6th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 365 0.0
2022 32 10th lowest of 15 · 160% of median 365 0.1
2023 34 11th lowest of 15 · 170% of median 365 0.4
2024 21 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 305 0.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4662 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2005-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.