Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CORYELL RANCH WELL NO.6
Structure dossier · WDID 3806776 · 2 · ROARING FORK RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:28 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1885-03-23 — 148th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CORYELL RANCH WELL NO.5 (1885-03-23). Immediately behind: CORYELL RANCH WELL NO.7 (1885-03-23).
Decreed rights (12)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12866.0 | 1885-03-23 | 1889-05-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 106 |
| 13090.0 | 1885-11-02 | 1889-05-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 136 |
| 13434.0 | 1886-10-12 | 1889-05-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 166 |
| 13608.0 | 1887-04-04 | 1889-05-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 170 |
| 15379.14336 | 1889-04-01 | 1892-02-09 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 206 |
| 22123.19097 | 1902-04-15 | 1910-08-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 217AA |
| 30941.14715 | 1890-04-15 | 1936-08-25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 298 |
| 39193.0 | 1957-04-22 | 1958-06-20 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDDOMSTKPWR | 715 |
| 39291.0 | 1957-07-29 | 1958-06-20 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUNDOM | |
| 53813.0 | 1997-05-02 | 1997-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRCOMFIRDOM | |
| 53973.0 | 1997-10-09 | 1997-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRCOMFIRDOM | |
| 57613.0 | 2007-09-27 | 2007-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUNFIRDOM |
Legal record & documents
12 decreed actions on record across
4 court cases:
07CW0164, 00CW0019, 98CW0310, 01CW0187.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
07CW0164 | 1 | 2007-12-31 | S |
00CW0019 | 2 | 1997-12-31 | S |
98CW0310 | 8 | 1958-06-20 | O, S |
01CW0187 | 1 | 1958-06-20 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 12 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | absent | no diversion records cached |
| record continuity | unknown | no record span to measure against |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.